[1 Peter 5:8]
You may notice I use the pronoun “they” frequently. Perhaps that’s sloppy journalism. No problem. According to Senator Dianne Feinstein, I’m not a real journalist anyways, because I didn’t go to school to earn a degree in Journalism and I’m not employed by a mainstream media corporation. By this twisted logic, she argues that I’m not protected by the “freedom of the press” clause in the First Amendment of the Constitution. No problem. I’m still protected by the “freedom of speech” clause. Of course this is just one more attempt to weaken the Bill of Rights and further suppress dissenting voices, this time by attacking bloggers and independent media. Regardless, I do possess a sense of journalistic integrity and I feel obligated to provide as much for my readers. So who are “they”? Is Dianne Feinstein among their ranks?
What is a good definition of “they”? If you happen to listen to Alex Jones, you’ll hear him refer to “globalists” a lot, which is less vague, but I tend to avoid that term. The globalists Alex Jones exposes are not the kum-ba-ya, one-love, utopian types, they’re more like the psychopathic, evil, world-domination types. When I think of globalists, I think of hippies. But clearly, “they” are not hippies, or ex-hippies even, although many masquerade as Liberals. Maybe globalism doesn’t sound threatening enough.
Up until recently I viewed the idea of world government as a necessary and positive progression of civilization; moving away from Nationalism toward a more global, human community. Once that was accomplished, I figured, the human species could then begin to solve the problems that have plagued us for centuries: war, famine, disease, poverty, etc. The United Nations was a step in the right direction, naturally. And, in a few hundred years perhaps we’d inhabit a universe like Star Trek, where these problems are long gone for the human race and what constitutes scandalous behavior is a starship Captain procuring a special vintage of real alcohol, racing off at warp eight to save a doomed planet, defying the Prime Directive of non-interference. The prognosis? Grim. What would it take to unite the world? An alien invasion? A global catastrophe? These are questions “they” have surely considered.
“They” are not the people of the world. The people of the world have always languished under authoritarian control, in every era, in every place on Earth. “They” are not strictly the civilian governments or politicians or business people of the world. “They” are not the rich. “They” are not the whites. “They” are not American. “They” are not you, or me. “They” are a hard group to identify, but there are clues. The clues are in their actions. Their actions reveal who they serve, as enemies of mankind. In this sense, “they” are individuals and groups of individuals, working surreptitiously to undermine humanity and enslave us for the sole benefit of themselves, and are found operating in all sectors of society.
The enemies of mankind are deceitful. Often their actions are in direct contrast to their rhetoric. We find many examples of this in the federal government. For example, if they really wanted to win the so-called “war on drugs” then they would stop using the CIA to manage the drug trade, importing illicit drugs into the country. They would legalize marijuana, thereby slashing the power of the drug cartels along the Mexican border. But the “war on drugs” is too lucrative. So is the “war on terror” and the innumerable other conflicts being waged around the world. If they were truly interested in peace and stability, then they would stop supporting unpopular, despotic leaders as long as they are malleable to American interests, and they would stop using radicals to stir up tensions and spark revolts in those same countries when they need to install a new puppet they can control. “They” play both sides. The past century is replete with examples of the CIA manipulating political outcomes in other countries: Greece, Iran, Guatemala, Vietnam, Laos, Haiti, Congo, Ecuador, Bolivia, Cambodia, El Salvador, Panama and Iraq- just to name a few.
Little has changed in the twenty-first century. Our leaders speak about spreading freedom and democracy while systematically toppling democratically elected leaders around the world. They portray themselves as humanitarians rushing to the aid of the oppressed, while ignoring human rights abuses and genocide. Why? Because “they” hold positions of power and influence within the civilian government. George W. Bush said in remarks about his presidential legacy, “I surrounded myself with good people… I carefully considered the advice of smart, capable people and made tough decisions.” Even our President is a puppet “they” control. If you’re not particularly bright when it comes to foreign policy or economics, you merely appoint advisers and “experts” to your Cabinet who make those tough decisions for you. These “experts” are more accurately cronies– former defense contractors, pharmaceutical and biotech industry leaders and Wall Street bankers- who are not elected by the American people and therefore do not have the American people’s interests in mind. “They” are totally unaccountable to the people and are frequently behind such legislative monstrosities as the Affordable Care Act, which has little to do with providing affordable healthcare and everything to do with expanding the federal government’s control over our lives. If they really wanted to help rescue the nation’s healthcare system, the FDA would stop allowing poisons to be added to our food and water supply. They would stop approving drugs and vaccines that destroy our body’s immune and neurological systems. They would stop harassing companies that produce natural remedies and doctors who promote nutrition to prevent diseases like cancer, heart disease and diabetes. They would stop legislating against home gardens and farmer’s markets.
The list of problems that could be righted by eliminating this corrupt influence is long. If they wanted to help relieve the pressure on the failing and overcrowded public education system, they would encourage more homeschooling, instead of seeking to ban it in states like California. If they wanted to bolster homeland security against terrorist threats and foreign invasions, they would encourage the proliferation of civilian militias instead of seeking to limit the Second Amendment and treating American citizens like criminals. If they wanted to empower citizens against disasters, both natural and man-made, they would encourage self-reliance, survival skills and preparation, instead of targeting preppers and survivalists and building FEMA camps to imprison the population in the event of chaos and civil unrest. If they wanted to create jobs, they would stop forcing manufacturing companies to leave for China, India and Mexico, and small business growth to stagnate because of draconian federal regulation and taxation.
What do they want then? Nothing short of complete control.
Call them globalists or authoritarians or criminals. Call them evil, call them satanic if you must. But follow the money and examine the legislation they support. These clues will help identify who “they” are. The United States government is not the only example of an institution that has been infiltrated. Many private companies, non-profit organizations, universities, churches and nations of the world are in the grip of corruption. The myth of the United Nations as a means of achieving global harmony is crumbling. Standing in the way of their agenda will help defeat them and restore freedom and self-rule to the people of the planet.
Be sober. Be vigilant.