Tag Archives: CIA

Don’t Worry Barry, You’re Safe.

obamaOn November 19th, three days before the fiftieth anniversary of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, somebody by the name of Everest Wilhelmsen posted an apparent threat against President Obama on his Facebook page:

“We now have authority to shoot Obama, i.e., to kill him. His willful violations and alienation of our Constitution, constant disregard for our peaceful protests and corruption of all the three branches of government, (i.e., rogue and illegitimate government), reveal the dictator that he is. Obama and his co-conspirators disrespect our Constitution (constitutional rule of law) and abuse the American people.  The authority to kill Obama comes from the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution: He is levying war on the United States and aiding and comforting our foreign enemies – the 2nd Amendment gives us the right and duty (authority) to engage an enemy of the United States that does so with the design to reduce us under absolute Despotism. I would be very surprised, if Obama does not leave Washington DC today (Nov. 19th) … never to return, if he is not dead within the month. PLEASE JOIN US AT CHRISTIAN AMERICAN PATRIOTS MILITIA: https://www.facebook.com/groups/417199228403274”

Most of the media is describing Wilhelmsen as the leader of a right-wing militia group, the Christian American Patriots Militia.  Excuse my snickering, but really?  To be specific, Everest Wilhelmsen is the administrator of a Facebook group called Christian American Patriots Militia.  As far as anybody knows, there is no actual militia, no compound and no stash of weapons.  In fact, a simple Google search turns up no website, manifesto or other discussion about Mr. Wilhelmsen or the Christian American Patriots Militia- only the aforementioned Facebook pages and other articles about the so-called “threat”.  I don’t buy it.  I dunno, maybe it’s the group’s name, Christian American Patriots Militia, and the fact that all of these groups are currently being attacked by the Obama Administration and portrayed as potential terrorists: Christians, Americans, patriots and militia groups.  How convenient, right?  What better excuse would the Administration need to escalate the crackdown on their enemies than “evidence” those crazy freedom lovers are beginning to talk armed revolution?  Is the next “threat” on Obama’s life going to come from the Racist Tea Party Veterans Militia?  Or perhaps the Gun Owners Against Obamacare Militia?

I decided to analyze this a little further.  Upon visiting Wilhelmsen’s page on Facebook, I must say that it appears legit, in other words, it appears to be created by a real person and not a fabricated profile and timeline created by a government operative.  While the original post from November 19th has been removed, the rest of the page is intact.  Incidentally, he’s still posting, with his most recent update occurring on November 23rd- a link to a WordPress blog post by a man named Thomas Mick entitled “The Duty of Our Oath”.  Wilhelmsen’s posts seem to be in line with a person having a conservative Christian bent.  With the exception of his anti-Muslim beliefs, I found myself to be mostly in agreement with his politics.  He’s definitely anti-Obama, anti-police state and pro-Constitution.  The page for the Christian American Patriots Militia currently has over 1,500 group members.  I didn’t care to join the group, so I couldn’t see any content, although the page’s cover image depicting the nation’s Capitol (in the layout of a cross) and Jesus cracking a whip at a group of suits was illuminating.  Poking around a little more, I also discovered a WordPress blog apparently authored by Wilhlmsen entitled ofthehighest, where he discusses law and human rights.  Featured prominently on the homepage is an article discussing “Grundgesetz”, which is Germany’s Basic Law (Constitution).  According to the article, one of the fundamental principles of Grundgesetz is the idea that “All state authority emanates from the people”.  Many of Wilhelmsen’s Facebook posts are re-posts from his blog or shares from other Islamaphobic Facebook pages.

What can we gather from all this?  Everest Wilhelmsen believes the world is being overrun with Muslims bent on destroying all of Christendom.  He apparently also believes the United States to be a Christian nation, and that President Obama is secretly a Muslim working to undermine American values and pave the way for Sharia law to supplant the Constitution.  Paranoid anyone?  I will agree that the persecution of Christians by Islamic radicals around the world is intolerable and the lack of outrage from Christians is puzzling.  Since the events of September 11th, 2001, Muslims have become a protected group, and criticism of Islam- even the horrendous actions of radical jihadists, is routinely ignored by the media.  This behavior has arisen from a flawed belief that America deserved to be attacked on September 11th because of our meddling in the Muslim world, and much of Obama’s foreign policy has been aimed at appeasing Muslims.  Certainly President Obama, in concert with Congress and the Supreme Court, has done plenty to weaken our Constitution and further the expansion of the authoritarian police state, but not because he is secretly a Muslim; he is a puppet working to acclimate Americans to globalist rule.  To view all Muslims as enemies is ignorant, and the United States is not a strictly Christian nation, although we should not deny the strong Christian influence on our nation’s founding.  If Wilhelmsen claims to be a supporter of the Constitution, then he clearly understands the government is forbidden from creating an establishment of religion, therefore, Christianity can not be declared the official national religion of the United States anymore than Islam or any other faith.  Likewise, the Constitution also prevents the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion- any religion.  Let’s not forget that atrocities in the name of God have also been perpetrated by Christians throughout history.  Any human being possessing the Spirit of the Creator, regardless of religious tradition, should denounce evil wherever it is found.

Assuming Wilhelmsen and his Facebook group are real, as my investigation suggests, did his post constitute a real threat to President Obama?  Hardly.  His statement suggests that under the Second Amendment of the Constitution, the people have the authority to engage an enemy of the United States, but it is Article Three of the United States Constitution which discusses treason:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

Whether or not that description applies to President Obama is debatable, but Wilhelmsen seems to be playing legal hopscotch between the Second Amendment, Article Three of the Constitution and the oaths that all elected officials and members of the Armed Forces take, whereby they swear to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

If we are to believe the propaganda that passes for journalism in this country, just weeks ago, a shooter with a note in his bag entered LAX airport aiming to “kill TSA and pigs” because his Constitutional rights were being infringed upon.  If recent incidents like these are not false flags, could it be that frustration with Obama’s tyrannical regime is beginning to culminate in these sorts of imprudent actions?  I wonder.  It is interesting to note that while the media has made a big fuss over Wilhelmsen’s post, in their ceaseless campaign to demonize the Right, why is it that he’s still posting updates on Facebook and not in an FBI interrogation room?  If President Obama was really in danger, don’t you think he’d be giving speeches behind bullet-proof glass?  I mean, wouldn’t that be smart anyways, considering he’s the nation’s first Black president, what with all those racist Tea Party wackos out there just waiting for their opportunity to pick him off?  The reality is, racism in America is overblown.  It is the Obama Administration and phony civil rights activists like Al Sharpton who are mostly responsible for stirring up racial and class tensions.  After all, it took a majority of White, middle-class voters to elect Obama.  The so-called enemies of the state are law abiding citizens, standing against a criminal government.  It takes a trained professional to kill a president.  At this stage in the game, the powers that be have little to fear from Christian patriots or Cletus and his shotgun.

Kennedy may have been America’s last real president, and he was killed.  Martin Luther King Jr. was a real civil rights activist, and he was killed.  When Malcolm X split from the Nation of Islam, abandoned its Black supremacist ideologies and began to speak of human rights, equality and peace, he was murdered.  President Obama likes to compare himself to Martin Luther King Jr. and Abraham Lincoln, but he is far from either.  Not that any man is without faults, but it seems to me it is the good people in the line of fire. As long as you are doing the bidding of your corporate controllers, you’re safe.  And Obama fits that profile perfectly.  It really doesn’t matter if he’s Black or White, Christian or Muslim, Republican or Democrat; these are insignificant details.  Just don’t go getting a conscience or anything Barry, otherwise be on the watch for CIA assassins.


Who Are “They”?

manBe sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.

[1 Peter 5:8]

You may notice I use the pronoun “they” frequently.  Perhaps that’s sloppy journalism.  No problem.  According to Senator Dianne Feinstein, I’m not a real journalist anyways, because I didn’t go to school to earn a degree in Journalism and I’m not employed by a mainstream media corporation.  By this twisted logic, she argues that I’m not protected by the “freedom of the press” clause in the First Amendment of the Constitution.  No problem.  I’m still protected by the “freedom of speech” clause.  Of course this is just one more attempt to weaken the Bill of Rights and further suppress dissenting voices, this time by attacking bloggers and independent media.  Regardless, I do possess a sense of journalistic integrity and I feel obligated to provide as much for my readers.  So who are “they”?  Is Dianne Feinstein among their ranks?

What is a good definition of “they”?  If you happen to listen to Alex Jones, you’ll hear him refer to “globalists” a lot, which is less vague, but I tend to avoid that term. The globalists Alex Jones exposes are not the kum-ba-ya, one-love, utopian types, they’re more like the psychopathic, evil, world-domination types.  When I think of globalists, I think of hippies.  But clearly, “they” are not hippies, or ex-hippies even, although many masquerade as Liberals.  Maybe globalism doesn’t sound threatening enough.

Up until recently I viewed the idea of world government as a necessary and positive progression of civilization; moving away from Nationalism toward a more global, human community.  Once that was accomplished, I figured, the human species could then begin to solve the problems that have plagued us for centuries: war, famine, disease, poverty, etc.  The United Nations was a step in the right direction, naturally.  And, in a few hundred years perhaps we’d inhabit a universe like Star Trek, where these problems are long gone for the human race and what constitutes scandalous behavior is a starship Captain procuring a special vintage of real alcohol, racing off at warp eight to save a doomed planet, defying the Prime Directive of non-interference.  The prognosis?  Grim.  What would it take to unite the world?  An alien invasion?  A global catastrophe?  These are questions “they” have surely considered.

“They” are not the people of the world.  The people of the world have always languished under authoritarian control, in every era, in every place on Earth.  “They” are not strictly the civilian governments or politicians or business people of the world.  “They” are not the rich.  “They” are not the whites.  “They” are not American.  “They” are not you, or me.  “They” are a hard group to identify, but there are clues.  The clues are in their actions.  Their actions reveal who they serve, as enemies of mankind.  In this sense, “they” are individuals and groups of individuals, working surreptitiously to undermine humanity and enslave us for the sole benefit of themselves, and are found operating in all sectors of society.

The enemies of mankind are deceitful.  Often their actions are in direct contrast to their rhetoric.  We find many examples of this in the federal government.  For example, if they really wanted to win the so-called “war on drugs” then they would stop using the CIA to manage the drug trade, importing illicit drugs into the country.  They would legalize marijuana, thereby slashing the power of the drug cartels along the Mexican border.  But the “war on drugs” is too lucrative.  So is the “war on terror” and the innumerable other conflicts being waged around the world.  If they were truly interested in peace and stability, then they would stop supporting unpopular, despotic leaders as long as they are malleable to American interests, and they would stop using radicals to stir up tensions and spark revolts in those same countries when they need to install a new puppet they can control.  “They” play both sides.  The past century is replete with examples of the CIA manipulating political outcomes in other countries: Greece, Iran, Guatemala, Vietnam, Laos, Haiti, Congo, Ecuador, Bolivia, Cambodia, El Salvador, Panama and Iraq- just to name a few.

Little has changed in the twenty-first century.  Our leaders speak about spreading freedom and democracy while systematically toppling democratically elected leaders around the world.  They portray themselves as humanitarians rushing to the aid of the oppressed, while ignoring human rights abuses and genocide.  Why?  Because “they” hold positions of power and influence within the civilian government.  George W. Bush said in remarks about his presidential legacy, “I surrounded myself with good people… I carefully considered the advice of smart, capable people and made tough decisions.”  Even our President is a puppet “they” control.  If you’re not particularly bright when it comes to foreign policy or economics, you merely appoint advisers and “experts” to your Cabinet who make those tough decisions for you.  These “experts” are more accurately cronies– former defense contractors, pharmaceutical and biotech industry leaders and Wall Street bankers- who are not elected by the American people and therefore do not have the American people’s interests in mind.  “They” are totally unaccountable to the people and are frequently behind such legislative monstrosities as the Affordable Care Act, which has little to do with providing affordable healthcare and everything to do with expanding the federal government’s control over our lives.  If they really wanted to help rescue the nation’s healthcare system, the FDA would stop allowing poisons to be added to our food and water supply.  They would stop approving drugs and vaccines that destroy our body’s immune and neurological systems.  They would stop harassing companies that produce natural remedies and doctors who promote nutrition to prevent diseases like cancer, heart disease and diabetes.  They would stop legislating against home gardens and farmer’s markets.

The list of problems that could be righted by eliminating this corrupt influence is long.  If they wanted to help relieve the pressure on the failing and overcrowded public education system, they would encourage more homeschooling, instead of seeking to ban it in states like California.  If they wanted to bolster homeland security against terrorist threats and foreign invasions, they would encourage the proliferation of civilian militias instead of seeking to limit the Second Amendment and treating American citizens like criminals.  If they wanted to empower citizens against disasters, both natural and man-made, they would encourage self-reliance, survival skills and preparation, instead of targeting preppers and survivalists and building FEMA camps to imprison the population in the event of chaos and civil unrest.  If they wanted to create jobs, they would stop forcing manufacturing companies to leave for China, India and Mexico, and small business growth to stagnate because of draconian federal regulation and taxation.

What do they want then?  Nothing short of complete control.

Call them globalists or authoritarians or criminals.  Call them evil, call them satanic if you must.  But follow the money and examine the legislation they support.  These clues will help identify who “they” are.  The United States government is not the only example of an institution that has been infiltrated.  Many private companies, non-profit organizations, universities, churches and nations of the world are in the grip of corruption.  The myth of the United Nations as a means of achieving global harmony is crumbling.    Standing in the way of their agenda will help defeat them and restore freedom and self-rule to the people of the planet.

Be sober.  Be vigilant.


War In Syria Is A War On Truth

syria_liesWhen I started this blog last month, the Obama administration was already rocketing towards complete tyranny, but then came the chemical attack of August 21 in Syria and the ensuing “debate” about U.S. military intervention.  The urgency of this situation has compelled me to discuss this now and place other posts on hold.

I cannot begin to explain the sense of dread that I feel.  Last night, as my wife and I were driving around town, we witnessed a large, black figure cross in front of us about a block away.  “What was that?!” I shouted in disbelief.  “I don’t know!” she shouted back.  It was clearly larger than a person.  My mind tried to rationalize it.  It was too big to be a deer.  My wife, who may have gotten a better look at it said, “It didn’t have a shirt on.”  What she saw was humanoid, but taller.  As we neared the intersection where the figure had passed, I turned right to follow it.  I flipped on my high-beams.  Nothing was there.  There was no commotion in the bushes beside the road.  Whatever it was had disappeared.  We were both shaken up, especially my wife.  She refused to say what she was thinking- it was a demon.  Strangely, I was silently considering the same, and I’m not a religious person.  I don’t routinely think about the “end times” or entertain warnings of the Apocalypse.  Instead of continuing to investigate what we saw, my wife pleaded with me to drive away.

Admittedly, the events in Syria and the response here at home have been heavy on our minds for weeks.  We have been stressed out, worried, angry and depressed.  Witnessing the farce that was the Senate and House meetings two weeks ago, and trying to probe the depths of evil displayed by Secretary of State John Kerry, Senator John McCain and others, likely influenced our perception that demons were now walking the Earth, literally.

President Obama’s grand gesture to seek the approval of Congress was disingenuous.  The televised congressional meetings were nothing more than a charade.  The decision to attack Syria was made long ago.  The hearings were dominated by a black cloud of recklessness.  Evil, corruption and lies were laid bare.  In keeping with the demonic theme, one could accurately say it was ghastly.  Of course Code Pink was there “protesting”, but they were being used.  It’s theater, folks.  We must question, why was this televised in the first place?  Why was Code Pink even allowed in the building?  To give the appearance of fairness or respect for the First Amendment?  Sure, but also to aid in framing the discussion as a clash of ideologies.  On one side, the reluctant, war-weary politicians, on the other side, wacko, liberal peaceniks.  By carefully framing the argument in this way, the administration succeeds in creating the narrative of a benevolent government who must do what is necessary to prevent more innocent children from dying.  Sometimes, you have to do something that is uncomfortable, because your higher morals demand it.  Obama is a hero.  The American people and the rest of world lack the same resolve. You are a coward if you do not support attacking Assad.  The Obama administration are masters of the straw-man.  In other words, it’s easy to scoff at Code Pink, but it’s not so easy to dismiss real facts.  Real facts and sound arguments were not voiced during the congressional meetings, however.  On any other occasion, Code Pink would have been dragged out of the building, bludgeoned by police, arrested and paraded in front of the media as domestic terrorists, but in this case, they are allowed to sit there, quietly holding up their painted red palms, so the viewers at home can say, “Lookit them stupid hippies!”

While there may be legitimate rebel forces in Syria who are dissatisfied with Assad, there are also radical Islamist groups like Jabhat al-Nusra fighting right alongside them; they share a common objective in removing Assad from power.  The goal of the FSA may be to unseat Assad and establish a more moderate government, but the goal of the extremists is to establish an Islamic state in Syria.  We are expected to forget that the Obama administration supports the rebel forces in Syria with weapons and taxpayer money.  We are expected to forget that the CIA and our special forces have been training these fighters and planting them inside Syria for almost three years.  We are expected to forget that many of these fighters are al-Qaeda.  We are expected to forget that the rebels have been implicated before in prior chemical attacks.  Furthermore, we are expected to look away as they destroy churches and slaughter Christians, Jews and minority Muslims.  We are expected to look away as they eat the internal organs of their victims and saw children limb-from-limb.

Assad is a dictator.  He commands what was a relatively stable state at odds with Western interests.  He was beginning to bow to pressure from the West to create reforms.  There is no evidence the Assad regime carried out the chemical weapons attack of August 21, 2013.  All that has been demonstrated is that a chemical attack using sarin gas occurred and innocent civilians were killed.  In fact, as the weeks progress, more and more evidence mounts pointing to the rebels as the true culprits.  There is no real reason for the United States to become involved in the Syrian civil war, regardless of who is responsible for the chemical attack.  This obstinate push to war by the Obama administration is purposeful.  They wish to accomplish their objectives of unseating Assad and handing Syria over to chaos, before all the evidence coalesces and they are revealed as instigators in the conflict.  Make no mistake.  This is not about the children of Syria; this is not a humanitarian cause.  For Obama, getting involved in the Syrian conflict serves as a convenient distraction from multiple scandals at home mounting with calls for impeachment, and worsening economic conditions.  Simultaneously, the shadow government can advance its agenda to further destabilize the Middle East and North Africa, as justification for a larger, regional war.  Syria may indeed be the flashpoint for such a war, with Russia, China and Iran all stating they will not allow attacks against Syria to go unanswered.  Now, as the threat of an imminent attack against Syria cools off, focus seems to be shifting towards Iran as a possible target.  The reason: weapons of mass destruction.  Are you starting to notice a trend yet?  If only 9% of the American people support an attack against Syria, roll out a more “evil” target.

It’s ironic that Russian President Vladimir Putin emerges as the sane voice of reason in this crisis, as he pushes for diplomatic solutions to avert war.  So, as the United States supervises this confiscation of Syria’s chemical weapons, we can likely expect accusations that the Assad government is rushing to hide their chemical weapons or otherwise putting up obstacles.  Already, Assad has said that if Syria is expected to join the Chemical Weapons Convention, then so should Israel, who has signed but not ratified the agreement.  Interestingly enough, both Russia and the United States, who have signed and ratified the CWC, have not destroyed their stockpiles of chemical weapons, as the treaty requires.   It wouldn’t surprise me at all to see John Kerry slither up to the podium a few months from now to announce an end to diplomacy with Syria. They are still foaming at the mouth to remove Assad.  The only thing that has stopped them (for now) is the unexpected, massive backlash from the American people and most of the world.  This is huge, but be assured, the shadow government is actively looking at plans to win over the American people.  This will likely include more lies, psy-ops and false-flag operations.  You can also expect a barrage of anti-Assad propaganda in the media.  Can’t you see the headline already?  “Syrian rebels uncover mass grave.” This is how they operate.  For them, this is merely a time for recalculation.

Related stories:

Montana Lawmakers Respond To Outcry Over Syria