Tag Archives: Obama

Resident Evil

obama_toastDecember 2015 and One American is just now declaring the Resident of the White House to be an agent of evil?  A little late you say?  Of course many of us have known for some time that the Resident is not who he claims to be. For me, this realization came a few months after he took office in 2009.  I naively cast my vote for Obama in 2008; my “hope” was that he would reverse the disastrous course we embarked upon under Bush Jr. with a return to Constitutional authority.  My enthusiasm quickly withered.  Not only did Obama fail to reconcile the embarrassments of Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and Iraq, he continued trampling the Constitution, tightening the grip of the federal government and anointing the executive branch with unprecedented power.  He greatly expanded the surveillance capabilities of the intelligence community, recruiting corporate partners to ensure all our data could be mined and shared.  He oversaw the introduction of enhanced screening procedures by the TSA and the militarization of our local police departments.  While scaling back our military overseas, he has continued a foreign policy centered on regime change, creating more upheaval and bitter animosity towards America.  And then there is the ACA, written by the insurance companies and engineered to squash the middle class.  Shall I continue?  We still have a year of Obama to endure (assuming the 2016 elections go as scheduled and he relinquishes his throne).  I suspect he will attempt to use his last year of residency to totally decimate what is left of the Republic.

His suspicious remarks started early in his brief political career and continued throughout his presidential campaign.  But now in 2015 he simply cannot open his mouth without vomiting on the American people.  Indeed, it is his most recent hurl of treasonous statements that has prompted me to finally formulate this post.  Regarding the legitimate concern over Syrian refugees entering the U.S. following the terrorist attacks in Paris, Obama had this to say during an appearance in the Philippines, “The idea that somehow they pose a more significant threat than all the tourists who pour into the United States every single day just doesn’t jive with reality… So my expectation is after the initial spasm of rhetoric, the people will settle down, take a look at the facts, and we’ll be able to proceed.”

But the facts are clear.  The FBI has admitted the vetting process for refugees is critically flawed.  During a recent House Committee on Homeland Security hearing, FBI director James Comey stated, “We can only query against that which we have collected… so if someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interest reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home, but… there will be nothing [that] show[s] up because we have no record of that person.”

Obama really thinks the American people are stupid, see?  He thinks you are unaware of the fact that Europe is in crisis as the borders of several nations are overrun with ungrateful and belligerent Muslim “refugees.”  We should ignore the fact that ISIS has specifically said they will exploit the refugee crisis to smuggle their terrorists into Europe and America. This is why we are screwed.  The governments of the West fostered al-Qaeda and ISIS, in the same way they fostered the Mujahideen in Afghanistan during the 1980s to repel the Soviets.  This makes it kinda hard, morally, to turn the flood of refugees away, being that we are primarily responsible for their displacement.  We should welcome these “widows and orphans” with open arms because this policy worked so wonderfully for Sweden and Germany, right?  Most of these widows and orphans are young men, in good health, sporting Aeropostal and Nike who somehow managed to pocket their smartphones and iPods while desperately fleeing ISIS.  Right.  The men have gone off to war; the soon-to-be widows and orphans are back in Syria and Iraq.  And what of the militant cells that are already present within our borders, like the Muslim couple who allegedly killed fourteen people in San Bernadino, California three weeks ago?  What about our unsecured southern border?  Why have an immigration policy at all?  Your concerns are unwarranted.  Shame on you, racist!

Obama is risking alienating all but the most schizoid totalitarians in his liberal base.  The ultimate goal here is not to provide safe haven for desperate refugees, but to incite conflict and unrest.  This insidious plan cannot be easily carried out while the citizens of America continue to possess firearms.  On the heels of the San Bernadino attack, Obama’s long standing goal of disarming the American people is finally taking shape, with his announcement from the Oval Office that your Constitutional right to keep and bear arms will be infringed if your name somehow lands on the the no-fly list.  And what earns you a spot on this list?  Apparently not links to terrorism, but maybe you have expressed your dislike of the Obama regime on Facebook or you operate a Tea Party website or you work for the Department of Homeland Security, who has seventy-two employees on the list, according to a Congressional investigation conducted back in August!  In other words, this list can get really long, really fast without any requirement of due process.

Let me say this- and this may burn some conservatives who read this blog- but Obama is not a Muslim.  It is critical that we all understand this.  I can certainly see how he might be perceived as a Muslim and there are many in the conservative and alternative media who continue to make this claim.  Call it elementary, but the Resident is a strong supporter of abortion, feminism and gay rights.  He eats pork and drinks alcohol.  Muslims condemn all these things.  I suppose I am assuming a degree of fidelity within Islam which is not warranted; after all, Muslims are permitted to lie if it furthers the cause of Islam.  Controlling the most powerful political office on Earth would certainly allow for copious fabrication under Islam.  If he is a Muslim, perhaps he is an operative for the Saudis and his liberal politics are simply a disguise.  Er… maybe.  Muslim leaders around the world can simply look the other way as Barry, in his best ghetto slang demands, “Give me some of them ribs.”

It is true that non-Muslims are not given equal treatment under Islam. There are several verses in the Qu’ran and the Hadiths, which sanction deceit, theft, rape, slavery and killing when perpetrated against non-believers or those who make war with Muslims.  Obama has no reservations about slaughtering innocent Muslims though, whether it be in Pakistan or Yemen or Libya or Iraq.  All we must do is examine the life of Muhammad to understand the questionable way in which Muslims are expected to conduct themselves.  I charge that the ruling class in Islamic societies are hypocrites and criminals anyway, living lives of decadence while their people are kept in a position of servitude. Behind closed doors, they do not adhere to Islam’s prohibitions and regularly partake in prostitution, gambling and drug use.  It would seem that ISIS would align themselves against the corrupt House of Saud, yet, it is Sunni wahhabism cultivated in Saudi Arabia with the cooperation of the West that is responsible for the majority of Islamic terrorism around the world.  ISIS, al-Qaeda, Boko-Haram and the Taliban are all militant Sunni groups.

Consider that despite all of Obama’s aid and comfort to the Islamists, they still want to cut his head off and put it on a stake, as CEO of the American infidels.  Although Obama claims to be Christian, his fruits indicate otherwise.  So, if he is not a Muslim and not a Christian, who or what is he?  I surmise that he is godless, which is far more dangerous.  And I am well aware of Barack Hussein Obama’s Islamic upbringing, his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and his comments supporting Muslims, but he is more accurately a Muslim sympathizerHis true allegiance is to the globalist New World Order, who are currently using Islam to destroy the current world order.  This is plain to me.  Although not a practicing Muslim himself, he allies himself with them, protecting and defending them every step of the way.  He deflects criticism against Islam.  He denies the very idea of Islamic terrorism, claiming the actions of militant wahhabists have nothing to do with the “peaceful” religion of Islam.

I am aware that there are many peaceful Muslims; there are many in the United States who fear ISIS and also wish to see our borders closed.  Imagine that.  There is a perception that ISIS and other militant Islamist groups have twisted the message of Islam to justify their violence.  In reality though, the Islamic State promotes fundamentalist Islam.  Murtadd is the Arabic term for an apostate in Islam.  It can apply to Muslims who have rejected Islam or those who refuse to follow the prescriptions of the Islamic faith, such as the requirement of women to wear hijab when in public.  This applies to most “moderate” American Muslims.

To be fair, Islam is not one unified, monolithic religion.  Within Islam there is considerable debate over whether coercion is authorized in the conversion of non-believers.  There is debate amongst Islamic scholars regarding areas of contradiction between the Qu’ran and the Hadiths (sayings of the prophet Muhammad).  Some of the Hadiths are believed to be more authentic than others.  Sunnis and Shiites have made war with each other for centuries over the proper succession of power following the death of Muhammad in 632 A.D.  This is not unlike the debate between various Christian sects regarding apostolic succession, apocryphal texts, baptism, etc.  The difference is that the message of Jesus Christ does not include calls for violence against his enemies.  In fact, the opposite is true:

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

[Matthew 5: 43-45]

We must accurately discern the unseen enemy behind the scenes in order to understand the larger agenda.  All of this deception is to the detriment of the Judaeo-Christian nations of the West, including the last stronghold, America.  We must remember, Satan is the Great Deceiver.  His goal is to destroy all mankind.  The New World Order is the world government of Satan.  As we approach the Great Tribulation, Satan infiltrates every tier of human civilization.  Confusion and deception are hallmarks of Satan’s influence.  Our government tells us we are in Syria and Iraq fighting ISIS, but we are actually supporting ISIS and other Islamist rebel groups seeking to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.  At the same time, we condemn Russia and the Syrian government, who are actually fighting ISIS and defending Christians, Jews and groups of minority Muslims.  It is overt propaganda.

The general policy of the United States over the past two decades has been to uproot key Muslim dictators that were once supported by the West and provided an environment of relative stability in those regions. Why the change in foreign policy?  Because, by increasing degrees, the government of the United States has been captured and controlled by globalists.  The globalist agenda supersedes American foreign policy.  It circumvents the Constitution.  It does not acknowledge the rights of the American citizen.  It will use whatever means necessary to set the world ablaze with terror, so that we turn to them for salvation.  In order to get this firestorm going, Saddam Hussein (Iraq), Muammar Gaddafi (Libya) and Hosni Mubarak (Egypt) had to be dealt with. And now the target is squarely on the back of Bashar al-Assad in Syria.  That does not mean these are the good guys, think of it like a great white shark devouring a school of barracuda.  They represent the old, corrupt world order; they are an obstacle to the new, vastly more brutal and demonic New World Order.

So, here is my timeline: 1) NWO wrestles control from the governments of the West, including E.U. and N.A.T.O. alliances (Britain, France, Germany and U.S.) and uses subversive means to create violent uprisings (Arab Spring) across the region.  Despotic leaders are toppled, creating a power vacuum.  In the West, this is portrayed as a democratic revolt, in order to generate sympathy for the Islamists.  Terrorists are called “protesters” and “freedom fighters.” Economic and security concerns draw other world powers (Russia, China, Iran) into the conflict.  2) Hosts of militant Islamic groups battle for control on the ground, each looking to lead a new caliphate.  As the Islamic State spreads and grows more powerful, more Muslim groups line up behind them, because they are seen as the most viable vehicle for conquest against the imperialist powers.  3) As destruction and chaos spread, a refugee crisis develops, which becomes a second front, as it is used to infiltrate the Western nations, undermine their culture and cripple them through terrorism.  Why is it that Saudi Arabia and the wealthy Gulf states (Qatar, U.A.E., Kuwait, Bahrain) have taken on zero refugees?  4) Only when the caliphate has enough muscle will it seek to overthrow the Saudi monarchy and threaten Israel, Europe, Russia and the United States.  Understand, the goal is not a military defeat, the goal is to draw us into a fractured global war, while they continue their campaign of terrorism inside our borders.  This is to weaken us economically, psychologically and spiritually, to the point where we finally give in to globalist domination.  When the New World Order has no more use for Islam, the Muslims will also become targets for elimination.

While it is clearly in the best interest of all to maintain stability in the Middle East, it is not in the best interest of the global elites, who are trying to play the last remaining super powers off each other to their mutual destruction.  Russians, to their credit, seem to understand the larger plot against them.  The entire civilized world should stand in solidarity against the threat of militant Islam, as that would derail the NWO plan to destroy national sovereignty and install their one-world system.  The fact that we are instead seeing implausible alliances, chaos and mayhem, lies and deception, points to the true architect of global domination- Satan himself!  Call him out!

Of course, it would be wrong to place all the blame for our situation on the current Resident.  It is the power of the executive office that is out of balance.  Our representatives spend their time on Capitol Hill turning in symbolic votes that serve merely to define their political image for the next election.  Legislative authority is being snatched up by the executive and judicial branches outside of law.  Obama is an empty shell and whether he acknowledges it or not, a tool of Satan.  How else can you explain the complete lack of integrity and accountability from his administration?  Deceitful, reckless and devoid of leadership, the Resident and his cohort John Kerry were rebuked once again by the Pentagon over the situation in Syria.  Perhaps it is because his semantics are not fooling anyone anymore.  Perhaps we’re not holding the winning deck, folks.

There is a warning here.  Just as we elected Bush Jr. as a reaction to Clinton’s scandalous behavior, and elected Obama as a reaction to Bush’s ineptness and war-mongering, we now stand to elect a potential strongman in Donald Trump as a reaction to Obama’s spineless treason.  The important question is, are we going to continue the trend of trashing our Constitution, by handing over our trust to another egocentric executive?  And it’s not that Trump is wrong on the issues, but we must understand how they use our emotions, our anger, our fear, our guilt, even our sense of charity to bring forth their plans.  All of this is orchestrated.  Who does this describe?  As if the terms Democrat and Republican mean anything anymore.  Obama is only the current Resident, but evil is lurking everywhere.  Put your faith in God first, then we must insist on restoring the integrity of our Constitutional Republic.

Advertisements

One American, 2014

eagle2013 was a tough year for freedom, here in America and around the world.  But as we saw with the crisis in Syria, we will be heard when we stand up collectively and say, “No!”  Thwarting the globalist agenda in Syria was a small victory in a year where liberty took some major blows.  As we head into another year of looming financial and environmental disasters, corrupt politics and massive media distractions, I thought it important to reflect on the reasons I started this blog back in August.  Already, 2014 promises to be a touchstone year for how this battle will play out.  Fukushima is near total meltdown with the Earth basking in deadly radiation, teenagers mindlessly rampage throughout suburbia and an “unknown” virus is on the loose.  Meanwhile, the dear leader is conveniently on a two-week family vacation in Hawaii playing golf.  We must, as a nation and a species, wake up from our trance!

“Governments fall from sheer indifference.  Authority figures deprived of the vampiric energy they suck off their constituents are seen for what they are: dead, empty masks manipulated by computers.  And what is behind the computers?  Remote control, of course.  Look at the prison you are in- we are all in.   This is a penal colony that is now a death camp, the place of the second and final death.”

– William S. Burroughs, The Western Lands

08/24/13: One American (An Introduction)

With politics more divisive than ever, it’s nothing special when another political blog pops up featuring the hallmark, “I want my country back!” rant.  It’s just another red-state, right-wing, rifle-toting redneck who somehow managed to figure his way ‘round the internet, right?  Or, it’s one of these regular, disenfranchised, middle-aged white guys just looking out for their families, who turn into raging xenophobes when their wallet is targeted.  Except, if you read a little further, you’ll see I don’t quite fit these profiles, and that’s important.  Because those who seek to control you want you to believe there is no common ground among the American people; they want our country polarized and divided, because it serves their purposes.

I was born in 1975 and grew up in a working-class family in the San Francisco Bay Area.  My dad was a Portuguese immigrant and my mom was born in Mississippi to Scotch-Irish parents.  Upon their families converging in California, they met and married.  My dad was a Teamster and drove a forklift.  My mom became a teacher and also worked at a semiconductor fab in Silicon Valley.  Our household was white, blue-collar and Democrat.  Ours was that mythical, normal, suburban life.  You know, Cub Scouts, soccer, skateboards and Nintendo.  We shared that lifestyle with families from many different backgrounds:  Black, Filipino, Korean, Mexican, Indian, Chinese, Vietnamese, etc.  And on Independence Day, we would all have block parties, barbeques, water balloon fights and shoot off fireworks together.  We were the melting pot.

As a teen, I was repulsed by politics and politicians.  I was spiritually minded, introspective and non-competitive; I leaned about as far left as possible in my manner of thinking.  Eventually, I reasoned I should be a good citizen and participate in the election process, so I cast my first vote for Bill Clinton, who defeated Bob Dole (and Ross Perot) in 1996.  In the 2000 election, not impressed with either George Bush or Al Gore, I voted for Ralph Nader on the Green Party ticket.  The events of September 11, 2001 changed my trajectory.  I remember wondering to myself that day why our jets weren’t in the air within hours.  Why the delay?  I started to open my eyes, but not in the way you might be inclined to think.  I didn’t develop a fear of Osama Bin Laden or Muslims.  Living in the Bay Area gifted me with great cultural diversity.  I had friends and classmates who were Muslim.  I studied world religions in college and as a personal interest.  I read poetry by Rumi.  When the Bush Administration decided to invade Iraq in 2003, despite no evidence of weapons of mass destruction, I started having serious doubts about the true motives of our government.  I remember the distinct feeling that something was wrong while watching the media coverage of the “shock and awe” bombardment of Baghdad.  In 2004, I voted for John Kerry and in 2008, I voted for Barack Obama, disillusioned with the declining state of the nation under Bush, but hopeful.  In 2012, I decided not to give Obama my vote for a second term and instead voted for Gary Johnson, candidate for the Libertarian Party.

The truth is, I’m not a Libertarian.  I’m not a Liberal.  I’m not a Conservative.  I’m not a Progressive.  I’m not a Democrat or a Republican.  I’m not the Tea Party.  I’m not a Socialist, a Communist or a Capitalist.  I’m not an environmentalist.  I’m not Occupy.  I’m not Anonymous.  I’m not an anarchist.  I’m not a conspiracy-theorist.  I’m not LGBT.  I’m not a Portuguese-Scotch-Irish-American.  In other words, I don’t have an agenda.  I am One American.  And I don’t own a gun… yet.

Without disparaging these groups, I have to ask, why are we, as a nation of individuals, so inclined to identify ourselves so narrowly?  Liberals are not liberal and Conservatives are not conservative.  I started this blog, in part, to demonstrate that despite our differences and contrary to what the media conditions you to believe, we all have a lot more in common.  And, we all have a lot at stake.  I am proud to be an American.  I love American culture.  I love American values.  I don’t believe in “tolerance” I believe in celebrating and embracing diversity.  I love all people.  I believe in family.  I believe in humanity.  I believe in love and compassion.  I believe in freedom.

Fully acknowledging the many blemishes on the history of the United States of America and the imperfections of the men who founded our country and wrote the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, the ideals that we, as Americans, value and aspire to are noble and unmatched in the history of Western civilization.  The values of liberty, truth and justice are worth fighting for.  The errors of the past and present should be held up to this light and made right.  Even if one argues that the Constitution was not originally meant to protect Natives, or Blacks or women or immigrants, it shall, by will of the people.  The problem is, the idea of “government of the people, by the people, for the people” is rapidly being washed awayOur ability to function as a free nation will end if we do not identify the true enemies of freedom and stop them.  In America, the idea of representative government has been usurped by subservience to special interest groups, the military-industrial complex, multi-national corporations and banks.  In this type of society you are not a citizen, you are a subject.

The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees my freedom of speech.  Despite this, for what I have just written in these few paragraphs, I can now be targeted by our government as a potential terrorist.  That should be disturbing to anyone reading this blog.  In fact, to be considered a terrorist, you no longer need to express disdain for the government, you merely need to proclaim support for the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.  If you’re a veteran returning from war or you proudly display the American flag, you’re dangerous.  I have always been an independent thinker.  As such, I have witnessed my own philosophy and world view morph several times.  Now it’s beginning to crystallize.  My core values and beliefs, those which have been constant throughout, have triggered an alarm inside me.  I am distraught.  Even I, not being a member of any Tea Party group, not owning a gun, not being particularly religious, can see the injustice of the IRS targeting conservative groups.  Perhaps you think this is ok, since you don’t agree with Tea Party politics.  But the fact of the matter is, wrong is wrong.  It is not politically relative.  They’re coming for everyone, eventually.  They’re coming for you too.

Those crying “I want my country back” can’t be so narrowly categorized anymore.  We’re not all “bitter clingers” or “joe sixpacks”.  We are students, engineers, laborers, farmers, veterans, journalists, police officers, taxi drivers, scientists, artists, musicians, entrepreneurs, truckers, doctors, teachers, designers, athletes, mechanics, small business owners- people from all walks of life and ethnic backgrounds.

Ironically, in 2004 I stood on a street corner in Northern California with my wife, who is Lakota, and our newborn daughter holding a sign reading “Iraq Lies Cost Lives”.  Even in “liberal” California I was cursed at and threatened.  It distresses me to see people who so vehemently opposed the Iraq War and then President George W. Bush, now lining up in support of President Obama, when he has only extended and deepened Bush’s abuses of executive power.  We are a label-handicapped society.  Is this irrational support of Obama because he’s a Democrat?  Is it because he’s a Liberal?  Is it because he’s Black?  Now, as I witness liberty groups, defenders of the Constitution, gun owners and people opposing President Obama’s policies being labeled as racists and potential terrorists, I have to wonder, who do they think we are?  If you and I are the enemy, who are they?

Originally published: 08/24/13


Don’t Worry Barry, You’re Safe.

obamaOn November 19th, three days before the fiftieth anniversary of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, somebody by the name of Everest Wilhelmsen posted an apparent threat against President Obama on his Facebook page:

“We now have authority to shoot Obama, i.e., to kill him. His willful violations and alienation of our Constitution, constant disregard for our peaceful protests and corruption of all the three branches of government, (i.e., rogue and illegitimate government), reveal the dictator that he is. Obama and his co-conspirators disrespect our Constitution (constitutional rule of law) and abuse the American people.  The authority to kill Obama comes from the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution: He is levying war on the United States and aiding and comforting our foreign enemies – the 2nd Amendment gives us the right and duty (authority) to engage an enemy of the United States that does so with the design to reduce us under absolute Despotism. I would be very surprised, if Obama does not leave Washington DC today (Nov. 19th) … never to return, if he is not dead within the month. PLEASE JOIN US AT CHRISTIAN AMERICAN PATRIOTS MILITIA: https://www.facebook.com/groups/417199228403274”

Most of the media is describing Wilhelmsen as the leader of a right-wing militia group, the Christian American Patriots Militia.  Excuse my snickering, but really?  To be specific, Everest Wilhelmsen is the administrator of a Facebook group called Christian American Patriots Militia.  As far as anybody knows, there is no actual militia, no compound and no stash of weapons.  In fact, a simple Google search turns up no website, manifesto or other discussion about Mr. Wilhelmsen or the Christian American Patriots Militia- only the aforementioned Facebook pages and other articles about the so-called “threat”.  I don’t buy it.  I dunno, maybe it’s the group’s name, Christian American Patriots Militia, and the fact that all of these groups are currently being attacked by the Obama Administration and portrayed as potential terrorists: Christians, Americans, patriots and militia groups.  How convenient, right?  What better excuse would the Administration need to escalate the crackdown on their enemies than “evidence” those crazy freedom lovers are beginning to talk armed revolution?  Is the next “threat” on Obama’s life going to come from the Racist Tea Party Veterans Militia?  Or perhaps the Gun Owners Against Obamacare Militia?

I decided to analyze this a little further.  Upon visiting Wilhelmsen’s page on Facebook, I must say that it appears legit, in other words, it appears to be created by a real person and not a fabricated profile and timeline created by a government operative.  While the original post from November 19th has been removed, the rest of the page is intact.  Incidentally, he’s still posting, with his most recent update occurring on November 23rd- a link to a WordPress blog post by a man named Thomas Mick entitled “The Duty of Our Oath”.  Wilhelmsen’s posts seem to be in line with a person having a conservative Christian bent.  With the exception of his anti-Muslim beliefs, I found myself to be mostly in agreement with his politics.  He’s definitely anti-Obama, anti-police state and pro-Constitution.  The page for the Christian American Patriots Militia currently has over 1,500 group members.  I didn’t care to join the group, so I couldn’t see any content, although the page’s cover image depicting the nation’s Capitol (in the layout of a cross) and Jesus cracking a whip at a group of suits was illuminating.  Poking around a little more, I also discovered a WordPress blog apparently authored by Wilhlmsen entitled ofthehighest, where he discusses law and human rights.  Featured prominently on the homepage is an article discussing “Grundgesetz”, which is Germany’s Basic Law (Constitution).  According to the article, one of the fundamental principles of Grundgesetz is the idea that “All state authority emanates from the people”.  Many of Wilhelmsen’s Facebook posts are re-posts from his blog or shares from other Islamaphobic Facebook pages.

What can we gather from all this?  Everest Wilhelmsen believes the world is being overrun with Muslims bent on destroying all of Christendom.  He apparently also believes the United States to be a Christian nation, and that President Obama is secretly a Muslim working to undermine American values and pave the way for Sharia law to supplant the Constitution.  Paranoid anyone?  I will agree that the persecution of Christians by Islamic radicals around the world is intolerable and the lack of outrage from Christians is puzzling.  Since the events of September 11th, 2001, Muslims have become a protected group, and criticism of Islam- even the horrendous actions of radical jihadists, is routinely ignored by the media.  This behavior has arisen from a flawed belief that America deserved to be attacked on September 11th because of our meddling in the Muslim world, and much of Obama’s foreign policy has been aimed at appeasing Muslims.  Certainly President Obama, in concert with Congress and the Supreme Court, has done plenty to weaken our Constitution and further the expansion of the authoritarian police state, but not because he is secretly a Muslim; he is a puppet working to acclimate Americans to globalist rule.  To view all Muslims as enemies is ignorant, and the United States is not a strictly Christian nation, although we should not deny the strong Christian influence on our nation’s founding.  If Wilhelmsen claims to be a supporter of the Constitution, then he clearly understands the government is forbidden from creating an establishment of religion, therefore, Christianity can not be declared the official national religion of the United States anymore than Islam or any other faith.  Likewise, the Constitution also prevents the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion- any religion.  Let’s not forget that atrocities in the name of God have also been perpetrated by Christians throughout history.  Any human being possessing the Spirit of the Creator, regardless of religious tradition, should denounce evil wherever it is found.

Assuming Wilhelmsen and his Facebook group are real, as my investigation suggests, did his post constitute a real threat to President Obama?  Hardly.  His statement suggests that under the Second Amendment of the Constitution, the people have the authority to engage an enemy of the United States, but it is Article Three of the United States Constitution which discusses treason:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

Whether or not that description applies to President Obama is debatable, but Wilhelmsen seems to be playing legal hopscotch between the Second Amendment, Article Three of the Constitution and the oaths that all elected officials and members of the Armed Forces take, whereby they swear to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

If we are to believe the propaganda that passes for journalism in this country, just weeks ago, a shooter with a note in his bag entered LAX airport aiming to “kill TSA and pigs” because his Constitutional rights were being infringed upon.  If recent incidents like these are not false flags, could it be that frustration with Obama’s tyrannical regime is beginning to culminate in these sorts of imprudent actions?  I wonder.  It is interesting to note that while the media has made a big fuss over Wilhelmsen’s post, in their ceaseless campaign to demonize the Right, why is it that he’s still posting updates on Facebook and not in an FBI interrogation room?  If President Obama was really in danger, don’t you think he’d be giving speeches behind bullet-proof glass?  I mean, wouldn’t that be smart anyways, considering he’s the nation’s first Black president, what with all those racist Tea Party wackos out there just waiting for their opportunity to pick him off?  The reality is, racism in America is overblown.  It is the Obama Administration and phony civil rights activists like Al Sharpton who are mostly responsible for stirring up racial and class tensions.  After all, it took a majority of White, middle-class voters to elect Obama.  The so-called enemies of the state are law abiding citizens, standing against a criminal government.  It takes a trained professional to kill a president.  At this stage in the game, the powers that be have little to fear from Christian patriots or Cletus and his shotgun.

Kennedy may have been America’s last real president, and he was killed.  Martin Luther King Jr. was a real civil rights activist, and he was killed.  When Malcolm X split from the Nation of Islam, abandoned its Black supremacist ideologies and began to speak of human rights, equality and peace, he was murdered.  President Obama likes to compare himself to Martin Luther King Jr. and Abraham Lincoln, but he is far from either.  Not that any man is without faults, but it seems to me it is the good people in the line of fire. As long as you are doing the bidding of your corporate controllers, you’re safe.  And Obama fits that profile perfectly.  It really doesn’t matter if he’s Black or White, Christian or Muslim, Republican or Democrat; these are insignificant details.  Just don’t go getting a conscience or anything Barry, otherwise be on the watch for CIA assassins.


Redskins: A Black And White Issue?

I jim_thorpeam just as annoyed as anyone by our nation’s propensity for political correctness, because it is frequently condescending and spoken by people who believe their careful words can hide their true feelings.  But there is a difference between political correctness and sincerity.  There is also a difference between placating people and bestowing honor.

This year, coinciding with the annual dispute over the celebration of Columbus Day, President Obama once again stirred up racial divisions by inserting himself into the debate over the use of the name “Redskins” by Washington’s NFL franchise team.  In an AP interview, the President said he would “think about changing” the name if he owned the team.  Many people, Native Americans especially, consider the term “redskin” a racial slur and highly offensive.  Leaders from various Native American groups have called upon Redskins owner Dan Snyder to change the team’s name, but Snyder has been defiant, saying he will “never” change the name, citing the team’s storied eighty year history.  While it’s hard to see how a football team’s eighty year history trumps thousands of years of indigenous culture, most Americans remain opposed to a name change.

The Washington Redskins are just one of countless sports teams across the nation, both professional and academic, which have appropriated Native American cultural symbols: arrowheads, war bonnets, tomahawks, feathers, etc. and paired them with “native” names like “Indians”, “braves”, “savages”, “chiefs”, “warriors”, etc.  The result is an amalgamation of cultural confusion not unlike that which occurs in the aftermath of any culture-clash.  History shows us that a variety of reactions always emerge from cultural conflicts.  There are always groups calling for a return to traditional ways, those urging an adoption of the dominant culture, and those seeking a middle-ground of mutual understanding, respect and co-existence.   In America we find all of these, including the descendants of European settlers co-opting Native traditions.  As a descendant of European settlers, it’s bothersome for me to see my people adopting the trappings of Native culture in their desire to be more “spiritual”, “tribal” or otherwise “in tune” with the Earth; hanging a dreamcatcher from your rear-view mirror doesn’t solve that problem.  In their ignorance, they believe this somehow honors Native people.  When it comes to football, many people believe the Redskins name honors Native Americans.  But it’s hard to make that argument when the very people they claim to be honoring say the name does not honor them.  And I’m pretty sure dressing up in war paint and feathers for a game, getting drunk and mocking traditional spiritual songs with chants of “hey-ya-hey-ya” doesn’t honor them either.

While I agree with Alex Jones that President Obama pounced on the mascot debate as a way to exaggerate the prevalence of racism in America and distract from the government shutdown debacle and the disaster that is Obamacare, I disagree with Jones’ belief that the team name honors Native Americans.  In a recent Infowars broadcast, he compares the Redskins to other NFL teams like the Minnesota Vikings, believing the name Redskins similarly conveys bravery, honor and strength.  There are a couple of problems with this comparison however.  I staunchly defend Alex Jones against accusations of racism, but I believe he is misinformed in this case.  Native American tribes are sovereign nations and they exist as such to this day.  The Vikings were an ancient, seafaring people, who’s culture has since been absorbed by modern society over the centuries, much like the ancient Celts, Saxons, Hittites, Vandals, Moors, etc.  The term “Viking” is from the Old Norse and means roughly, “one who takes part in an overseas expedition”; unlike “redskin”, there is no derogatory association.   Although, if any modern-day Vikings existed, they might very well protest the romanticized image of a gruff, blonde-haired warrior, complete with horned helmet, which historians conclude was only used in religious ceremonies, not in battle.  They might also protest their entire culture being reduced to a football mascot.  “Redskin” is a slur, the same as “nigger” or “wetback” or “slanty-eye”.  Yes, so we’re told Native Americans called Europeans “paleface”- arguably also a slur.  Personally, I’m not offended, but I might be if a Native-owned football team called themselves the Plymouth Palefaces and made the likeness of say, a crazed Reverend Dimmesdale spiking a football their logo!

So what about other teams, like the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame?  Their mascot is basically a bare-knuckled boxing leprechaun.  Pretty offensive if you’re of Irish decent, right?  In this case, maybe not.  Why?  Because the Irish people have become part of the dominant culture in America.  I suspect the case might be different if the team was owned by an English lord in the sixteenth century.  So, it’s also a matter of setting.  Native Americans are not part of the dominant culture; they continue to suffer the devastating effects of European colonization and a great many live in startling poverty.  What becomes lost to history is the fact that each tribe of the Americas had a unique culture; for a long period of time, their collective way of life was officially targeted by the U.S. government for complete eradication.  Dan Snyder didn’t personally conquer the Natives, but he certainly profits from their “brave” legacy.

With that being said, not all Natives are offended by the team’s name.  Not all Natives take offense to being called “Indians” or “American Indians”, despite the fact that the term originates from Christopher Columbus’ faulty conclusion that he had landed in the East Indies when he came ashore in the Caribbean; he called the indigenous people he found living there indios.  I live on a reservation in Montana and have personally witnessed tribal members wearing Washington Redskins jackets and Cleveland Indians hats; for some it is a matter of pride.  Many call each other Indians.  Whether or not that should be discouraged is not really for me to decide.  Similarly, in the song Sucka Nigga (1993) by the group A Tribe Called Quest, Q-Tip raps, “And being that we use it as a term of endearment” in reference to the word “nigger”, pointing out that for many young Black people, the word serves as an expression of friendship.  The song was part commentary on the heated debate over the use of the word at the time. Some African-American people are offended by the word, others are not.  Some prefer to be called “Black” instead of African-American.  For most, whether or not an offense has been committed depends entirely on whom is using the word and whom it’s directed at.  I don’t recall ever hearing a Native call another Native “redskin”.  It’s not necessarily the wording you choose, but what’s in your heart that matters; that’s the general consensus.  But that wording can still evoke pain.

I have to agree with Obama and Bob Costas here, who called the team’s name an “insult” and a “slur” during NBC’s Sunday Night Football broadcast (featuring the Washington Redskins vs. the Dallas Cowboys ironically), although the manner in which these types of political distractions are disseminated to the people (frequently through NBC) is questionable.  The political pressure is on and the media is gearing up.  We don’t need the government to step in here; we should leave it up to the people to protest or boycott the Redskins or the NFL if they see fit.  But I do think Dan Snyder, the NFL and much of the conservative media need to lend an ear to Native people’s objections.  I’m sure most Natives feel there are more pressing issues concerning their people that they’d rather have the President address, and Bob Costas never took issue with the name Redskins before that I can recall, but changing the team’s name would serve as an important gesture of respect, nonetheless.


“Shutdown” Exposes Government’s True Agenda

ufo_capitolJust when you thought mainstream media propaganda couldn’t be any more blatant, NBC ran a series of revolting specials earlier this month, all designed to praise Obamacare and reinforce the notion that we need the government for everything.  On September 30th, following a melodramatic story about the fate of annual elk-watching activities at Yellowstone in lieu of a government shutdown, the NBC Nightly News ended with anchor Brian Williams’ words, “Our cameras picked up another gorgeous sunset in Washington, the question there is, when we see the sun again tomorrow morning will it rise over a city paralyzed by a government shutdown?”

One can hardly call the fiasco in Washington D.C. a “shutdown”.  If we are expected to believe the myth that the shutdown is due to a lack of funding, because Congress and the President can’t agree on a budget, then we might expect things like welfare checks being postponed or the NSA suspending domestic spying operations- hah!  Or, we might expect to take a leisurely hike through Yellowstone National Park without the benefit of a park ranger to give us directions or warn us about rattlesnakes.

Instead, we are witnessing extra money being spent on bureaucracy, barricades and security to close national parks and monuments, where no barricades or security were in use before- even in locations not funded by the federal government, like Mount Vernon (George Washington’s historic plantation), which is privately owned and operated.  In fact, hundreds of privately managed parks and businesses which reside on federally owned land, providing the government with tax revenue and the American people with jobs, were forced into closure for the duration of the shutdown.  A group of mostly senior citizens, including tourists from Japan, Australia and Canada, were held for hours in their hotel rooms at Yellowstone National Park by armed guards because their tour unfortunately landed on October 1st, when the boot-stomping- err, shutdown- commenced.   Some of the tourists were treated so harshly they thought they were under arrest.  The government even went so far as to block the highway off-ramps leading to Mount Rushmore in South Dakota, so that the monument could not be seen.  The state of Arizona offered to use its own funds to keep Grand Canyon National Park open, but was denied by the federal government.  Taking a jog through Valley Forge National Historic Park in Pennsylvania got one man fined $100.  And perhaps worst of all, war veterans were threatened with arrest by the feds for visiting the World War II and Vietnam War Memorials and the Iwo Jima Monument, which were all closed off because of the shutdown.  In defiance, veterans, some World War II Marines in their eighties and nineties, broke through the barricades and exercised their freedom to visit these open-air memorials.

Across the greater Washington D.C. area, playgrounds, walking paths and bike trails were closed, which require no staff or funding to keep open.  But Lincoln Park, which is known to be used by several members of Congress was kept open.  Non-essential employees like President Obama’s staff of gourmet chefs are still employed, meanwhile low-income military families who depend on the commissary for tax-free groceries were forced to shop elsewhere.  Camp David and a military golf course used by the President remained open, but thankfully, Michelle Obama publicly stated she would stop Tweeting.  Aren’t Twitter accounts free?  Catholic priests working on military bases ministering to soldiers were told they could no longer provide religious services like mass and baptism.  When the priests offered to volunteer their services for free, they were threatened with prison.  Visitors to the Amber Alert website were re-directed to a page stating the website was unavailable due to a lapse in federal funding.  People became outraged when they discovered the actual website was still running and that staffers had been used to create a re-direct in the URL.  There are literally dozens of examples of President Obama’s “shutdown theater”, many more of which are outlined in a disturbing article on Breitbart.com.  The goal of all this?  “We’ve been told to make life as difficult for people as we can.  It’s disgusting.” said an angry park ranger who blew the whistle on the Obama Administration’s bullying tactics to the Washington Times.

Compared to the Department of Defense or IRS, the country’s national park system is perhaps one of the least expensive departments of the government to operate, but is one of the most symbolic.  In other words, shutting down national parks does virtually nothing in the way of cutting spending or reducing debt, but is designed to show force and punish the American people- for political gain.  The result of all this is an American public now furious with Republicans in the House of Representatives, who are being wrongfully blamed for causing the shutdown and furloughing thousands of government employees.  Of course Congress has been inept for decades, but we should be in praise of those few willing to take a stand against disastrous decisions like raising the debt ceiling (again) or allowing Obamacare the funding it needs to properly cripple the economy and destroy the middle-class.  As Republicans, again and again, offered compromises to re-open the government and begin negotiations, President Obama, again and again, threatened to veto any legislation placing boundaries on his agenda.

In the midst of this political mess, Miriam Carey, a mother, was murdered by Washington D.C. police in front of her one-year-old daughter because she was confused and frightened by a makeshift military checkpoint.  Let me repeat, a military checkpoint.  When the unarmed woman fled, she was pursued by frenzied cops and executed.  She was shot twelve times at close range, through the windows of her car.  Meanwhile around D.C., manic police smashed into barricades with their patrol cars to give the appearance of a chaotic situation deserving of a total lockdown.  Members of Congress praised the police as heroes and applauded their efforts to keep them safe.  The media salivated at the opportunity to cast the woman as a rampaging Tea Party activist, storming the White House with guns ablaze.  She never rammed a White House fence or fired a shot, as was initially reported.  There was never a threat to members of Congress or the President.  That didn’t stop the feds however from descending on her Stamford, Connecticut neighborhood, complete with bomb-defusing robots, to search her home for anti-government literature.  When the truth was revealed that she was a young, Black, dental-hygienist, being medicated for mental health issues, the story quickly lost its usefulness.

The very next day, a man later identified as John Constantino of Mount Laurel, New Jersey, gave a “crisp military salute” to the Capitol, doused himself with gasoline and set himself on fire, according to a witness.  He died later at a hospital from severe burns.  The media downplayed the significance of this event, saying he may have been protesting.  The man’s family issued a statement saying he suffered with mental illness and that his death “was not a political act or statement”, reported NBC.  But self-immolation has long been seen as a form of radical political protest.  One of Constantino’s neighbors, Regina Horner, told Reuters that Constantino was a friendly man who showed no signs of depression.  She added, “He did not want to talk about politics because the government did not care about us.”  Perhaps he was giving a final salute to the Republic?  We can only speculate.  But the fact that this occurred on the National Mall, in the midst of all this political scheming, does beg the question.

With the majority of the federal government still in operation, the “shutdown” is mostly an illusion, but one in which real Americans have suffered.  Ours is a nation seized by international corporate interests who control the media and your mind.  This is nothing more than a psychological operation designed to sway public opinion and crush the Obama regime’s opposition, so they can continue with their plan to spend the economy into the dirt and expand their authoritarian, welfare, nanny state.  It is so anti-American, so anti-human in fact, it may as well be an alien takeover.  And what do you do when there is an alien takeover?

You resist, or die.